Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts

Saturday, July 12, 2025

BOOK REVIEW - "WHEN CULTURE HATES YOU: PERSEVERING FOR THE COMMON GOOD AS CHRISTIANS IN A HOSTILE PUBLIC SQUARE" BY NATASHA CRAIN


Nobody really wants to be at odds with society. But that's not always possible, especially when those with a differing world view are trying to influence society in a guiding it to lemming cliff, and you opening your mouth about a better alternative is considered a threat. Apologist and podcaster Natasha Crain has written the timely book "When Culture Hates You: Persevering for the common good," which informs us why we're in this situation and guidelines on response.

Part One, consisting of the first five chapters, is titled "Understanding the Hate." In this, Crain reminds us that Jesus and Scripture warn we will be hated by the world. We are introduced to the concept of "the common good," and how that "common good" can be politicized for the purpose of trying to silence those from a traditional Christian worldview. Crain answers five objections to a Christian influence in the public square, as well as giving us the acronym ACT to describe how we should persevere: 

  1. Know your (Biblical) Authority, 
  2. Strengthen Conviction, and 
  3. Maintain Tenacity.
The second part of this book, "Responding to and Persevering Through Today's Most Prominent Charges," gives suggestions on how to deal with antagonists like the mainstream media, secular social justice advocates, and feminist and LGBTQ+ activists. In each of five chapters, dealing with charges of being Dangerous Christian Nationalists, Power-Hungry Oppressors, Controlling Misogynists, Cruel Rights-Deniers, and Hateful Bigots, Crain defines the issues and focuses on the reality as opposed to the subjective, inflammatory name-calling. Each of these chapters include Quick Responses to 5 Popular Challenges and 7 Actions for the Common Good. She closes the book with an admonition to let our light shine in spite of hate, and provides resources.

As I stated at the beginning, this is a timely book, and I recommend it for personal reading and to discuss in small groups.


  1.  




Friday, July 4, 2025

'25 SUMMER READING LIST, #25 - "TURN NEITHER TO THE RIGHT NOR TO THE LEFT" BY ERIC SCHANSBERG



Happy Independence Day. I originally was going to delay the finale of this series tomorrow (July 5th) so I could have a blog focused on the holiday. However, when I started on what was originally intended to be the July 2nd entry - "Turn Neither to the Righ Nor to the Left: A Thinking Christian's Guide to Politics and Public Policy" by D. Eric Schansberg - I realized this would be appropriate today.

Schansberg starts by introducing Government's role in the Bible and pursuing Godly goals with Godly methods. He follows up with why Christians shouldn't legislate righteousness, but rather legislate justice. One issue with legislating justice is when it is redistributing to the non-poor.

But what about abortion? Schansberg closes with that issue, pointing out it's a legislating justice issue that sounds like a legislating righteousness issue. My favorite story was when he mentioned a woman who set up a tent near an abortion clinic giving information on adoption, including lists of those who are wanting to adopt.
 


Sunday, June 4, 2023

SUNDAY PSALMS PART 22 OF 48 - PSALM 94:20

 

Burns Development, Lawrence, IN, near Fort Benjamin State Park

 Shall the throne of iniquity, which devises evil by law,
Have fellowship with You?
                    Psalm 94:20, New King James Version

 How many of you are familiar with this passage? What do you think of the concept of evil being devised by law? 

I know many who would say that Democrats are good at devising evil by law, such as the increase of ground gained by the LGBTQ lobby and the efforts to keep abortion legal. And those who disagree with my friends, remember that your disagreement with them doesn't mean my friends are wrong.

But before you put the black hat on the donkey and look for a white hat big enough to put on an elephant, can you make an argument that the GOP sometimes does the same thing in different ways? Do we allow for tax loopholes that make the rich richer? Is it moral to send our young people to a foreign country for the purpose of killing them? Is it just wishful thinking to think our party is really any more godly than the other?

You don't have to go far back to see examples of this both on the right side and on the left side. The former are the Nazis, the latter are the Communists. Millions of Christians have been persecuted and even killed because of the godly edicts of these two terrorist ideologies.

Of course, there are some that believe the greatest villain in Church History is Constantine, allowing the formerly persecuted Christians to become corrupted by being a favored lobby of the government. And that hasn't changed - there are believers of both parties who put trust in that anointed party to usher in their ideas of morality.

What's the point of today's post? Be watchful. Discern what is good of any view and what isn't. Realize that God can use the party you oppose, and also that the party you support is capable of rebelliously opposing the true Sovereign of the world.

Another point, which is harder to answer. Is it better to be a law abiding citizen of an evil government or a law breaker in a country that has breaking God's law part of its constitution? And are we called to stand up against a godless nation?

Thursday, August 4, 2022

INTERVIEW WITH POLITICAL ACTIVIST/FOUNDER OF PRO LIFE LIBERTARIAN CAUCUS RUSSELL BROOKSBANK

 


I met Russell Brooksbank (and several other Libertarian 2016 Congressional Candidates) at the Signing of the Compact for Liberty. While I don't think our paths have physically crossed since, I've kept up with him via the internet. 

JR: Welcome to my blog, Russell. I’ll start with a typical question – could you tell us how you became a Christian and how you became a Libertarian? (Okay, the second part is only typical when I’m interviewing a Libertarian.)

RB: The short answer to both of those questions is, “I was born that way.” I grew up in a Christian home. My parents made sure that I knew God. I was baptized as an infant in the Roman Catholic church my dad grew up in. I remember attending the Bible School that the neighborhood Baptist Church put on in the Summer. I grew up, and was confirmed, in the Lutheran Church. I was an acolyte, a choir member, and later served on the church council overseeing the few youths we had. I was baptized again as a young man in a park by full immersion in a metal trough while at a Bible study group I was involved with. I now attend a non-denominational Christian church. I can’t point to one particular time where I can say, “That’s when I became a Christian.” I can, however, point to many times when I have fallen and then subsequently rededicated my life to Christ. Isn’t it great that we have a God who is willing to pick us up, dust us off, and let us try again? 

I’ve also always been a libertarian. I just didn’t know it. I knew there was something inherently wrong with violating people’s rights. My parents did good raising me to adhere to the Golden Rule. My dad instilled a love of country and service to others. I was raised to stand up for people and for what I believed in. I knew what was right. I knew tyranny when I saw it. I grew up thinking that the Republican Party stood for the things I believed in, like limited government. I was so wrong. 

I joke that I was diagnosed libertarian, but it really is the truth. I was going through a rather difficult time and sought out counselling to help me navigate the rough weather of life. It helped me immensely by the way. It was during a session where we were talking about me finding some friends outside of work that she said, “I believe you are a libertarian. There’s a group that meets at Kingfish every second Tuesday of the month. Your homework is to go to one of their meetups and make some friends.” Well, the rest, as they say, is history. I found my tribe at that meetup. Finally, a group of people that I could relate to. I’ve been a Libertarian ever since and haven’t looked back. 

JR: I met you when you were running for the 9th Congressional District for the US House in ‘16. What was it like with that campaign? Did the Presidential Campaign of that year (Trump vs. Clinton for those who aren’t familiar with the distant past) have any impact on your campaign? Any experiences and/or lessons-for-everyday-life that you’d like to share? 

RB: I had an awesome time running for Congress. I really enjoyed going around the district to various events. From what you know of me, you would not guess that I’m a very introverted person. I get bad stage fright. Putting myself out there, making speeches, and doing interviews was frightening, but exhilarating. It really helped me get over my fears. I ran my campaign with blinders on. What I mean by that was I did not care what anyone else was doing. I was there to give people a choice. I was going to talk about what I would do, not about my opponents. I was there to educate, inspire, and build bridges, not tear down my opponents. Because, at the end of it all, we are all members of the community and have to find a way to coexist. 

I’m sure the Presidential campaign had some impact. We had two very polarizing candidates running. People were hungry for something different. They looked for alternatives. That probably helped boost my numbers a bit. I’m proud of what I was able to accomplish. I received over 17,000 votes while spending only $400 on a congressional campaign. There isn’t a major party candidate who can touch that vote per dollar ratio, LOL. 

My big life lesson takeaway from this is: Don’t be afraid! I saw a void in leadership and put myself out there. If you can do something and you don’t then can you really complain? I didn’t win, but I tried. I can at least tell my grandkids that I stepped into the arena. I mean, there has been an Indiana representative in Congress since the 14th Congress. That means there has been only 112 elections. My name will be included in history as being on the ballot for one of them. How cool is that? Not many people get to say that.  


JR:
I’ll ask the question you’re probably wanting me to ask: What could you tell us about the Libertarian Pro-Life Caucus? How and when did it start? What does the Caucus do? Is it more of a bridge between the pro-life movement and the LP, or is it more independent of the other movements? 

RB: The Pro Life Libertarian Caucus started in earnest after the 2020 Libertarian National Convention. It was in the “Beta” stage during the convention. It was an idea that had been brewing in my head for a few years prior to that. I was always asking around and gauging interest for the formation of a caucus. I knew that I was pro-life, and I could see where the pro-life message could, and should, be the message within the Libertarian Party. I wondered if there were people like me within the party. I found that there were. There is a huge number of pro-life people within the party. 

So, I started the formation of the caucus in order to give pro-life libertarians a voice within their party. The process was a long one. We started with an organizational committee. Then after months of hashing out bylaws, platform, statement of principles, we held our online convention that took us months to complete. Our first convention officially adjourned on June 7, 2021. What we do is simply stated within our SoP. “We believe that a pro-life stance is the correct stance for the Libertarian Party. 

We strive to move the culture of the Libertarian Party towards that stance by supporting candidates for party leadership, nominees to public office, changes to our party platform, and education of fellow members.” While we will work with any pro-life organization to rid our world of the abomination that is abortion, we are primarily a group dedicated to change within the Libertarian Party. Part of changing the culture is living our principles out loud. We recently partnered with a person within the party to buy formula for some folks during the shortage. So, I see the PLLC as a vehicle to change hearts and minds within the LP and to help our community. 

JR: There are two big things that have happened this year. Well, actually one big thing and one humongous thing, but I’ll start with the big thing. Did the Libertarian Party get rid of their pro-choice plank? Could you describe what changed? How has it affected the LP? And does it change the function of your caucus? 

RB: Yes! We finally were able to get rid of the plank. For those unfamiliar, the process is simple. Each delegate to the convention gets 5 tokens (votes) that they can use to vote to bring any platform plank up for a straight up or down vote to delete it from our platform. They can put all their votes on one plank, spread them around, or don’t vote for any. If a plank gets votes totaling 20% of the number of delegates, then it comes up for a non-debatable yes or no vote. Then it takes just a simple majority to remove it. The abortion plank had come up for deletion at every convention I could remember. The token votes increased exponentially. We almost had a majority in 2020. This time around we had an overwhelming majority. The plank has been removed. 

What has changed is that now the national platform is silent on the issue. They tried to be neutral with the plank, but it failed. This change allows for members and candidates to truly be free to hold whatever opinion they want. The party has gone from, “What does the Libertarian Party think?” to “What do you, a Libertarian, think?” A much better question, don’t you think? 

I believe this will make for a better, more inclusive, LP. There were a lot of people that have told me that they just could not join or support the LP because of that plank. That obstacle is now gone. The work of the caucus is far from over. It really is just beginning. We have state affiliates and their platforms to deal with. We have hearts and minds throughout the party to win. We have candidates to support. We have programs to support. There is a lot of work to do. We are growing by leaps and bounds. I’m very excited for the future of the caucus. 

JR: Of course, the humongous thing is the overturning of Roe v. Wade. And of course the Democrats aren’t happy and the House passed a couple of bills to regain (and probably expand) their ideology. Personally, I’ve had a concern that if Roe v. Wade was overturned, many pro-lifers will congratulate themselves on a job well done and forget about the crisis pregnancy centers which will be more in need. What do you see as the short and long term effects of the SCOTUS decision? And again, how does this impact the Libertarian Pro-Life Caucus? 

RB: I issued a statement after the SCOTUS decision was handed down. It read: 

“Today was an awesome day! Today, the Supreme Court rightfully sent the issue of abortion back to each state to wrestle with individually. They found that there was never a constitutional right to kill your child because they were inconvenient. 

"Overturning Roe v Wade is an enormous victory, and I don’t want to belittle it, but there is much more work to be done. This is just the beginning. Now the fight moves to each individual state. We can’t rest. We need to push forward. We must end this practice! 

"The opposition has been riled up. They now have a rally cry. We need to be louder. Time to write your state government demanding that they recognize the rights of all people regardless of their stage of development. Time to stand firm. 

"This news also affords us the opportunity to live our principles out loud. Not only do we need to stand firm, but we need to step up. What is something that you could do to help someone in need? What can you do to help those single mothers not feel like they need to consider abortion? What can you do to help the victim of rape not feel worthless and pressured to have an abortion? What can you do to make the lives of children in foster care better? Figure out what you can do, then go do it! 

"This decision will not stop abortion in this country, but love, compassion, and understanding can. Let’s be the light. I’m going to go love someone who is hurting today. Will you join me?” 

The Pro Life Libertarian Caucus will continue to promote the Libertarian values of supporting the rights of all people regardless of location and station and supporting voluntary action to care for our fellow human beings.  


JR: Thank you for your time. How can we learn more about the caucus? 

RB: Thank you so much for the opportunity. Our website is: https://libertyprolife.org/PLLC/ We also have a Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/ProLifeLC) and a Facebook group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/610649603400706/) And we are on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LPProLifeCaucus.


Sunday, January 16, 2022

LET'S SEE - SHOULD I MENTION SANCTITY OF LIFE SUNDAY IN MY BLOG?

 I remember a few years back saying that we should make as big a thing about Sanctity of Life Sunday as we do about Earth Day.

But do I make as big a thing about Sanctity of Life Sunday as I do about Earth Day? Which, by the way, is absolutely nothing?

I noticed the lesson title for the January 16, 2021 in the Lifeway Sunday School quarterly "God values all human life." I also figured out that it fell on Sanctity of Life Sunday. And I decided I needed to write a blog for Sanctity of Life Sunday as I do for Reformation Day, All Saints Day, Pentecost, and other important days.

That decision was made January 15, 2021 (aka today).

I had just finished a series on Church Fathers and had a book review scheduled for today: Voice of a Prophet by A.W. Tozer. (It will be reviewed next week.) I had no thought about writing a blog  on Sanctity of Life Sunday prior to today.

No, this day was not really on my radar. But should it be? Rather, should I not realize every day is Sanctity of Life Day? Why focus more on it on one day than not give it equal attention every day?

Well, one reason is too often if we don't give something special attention on one particular day, we're tempted to give much focus on it the rest of the time.

There are some who say that the pro-life movement is too focused on the unborn and not the born. We want to outlaw abortion while we say nothing against racism or domestic violence or human trafficking, while we are silent about refugees. I agree completely with them. Of course, some of those critics are really saying we shouldn't be focused at all on the unborn, and of course they're wrong. 

As Christians, we need to realize that mankind is created in the image of God. Likewise, we need to not only see that of mankind as a whole but of each and every individual in that whole. 

How should we live in that light? Let me give some suggestions.

  • We can smile and greet others, and thank them when they do something.
  • We can be faithful to the Great Commission. 
  • We can stand up for others when we see them bullied, oppressed, insulted or otherwise mistreated.
  • We can listen to those we disagree with and treat them with respect as we want to be treated.
  • We can make it clear that every human life, including the unborn, is valuable and protect them.  
  • We can also speak out loud and strong against any sin that minimizes the life of others.
In closing: I usually am not one to protest. I oppose abortion, but I think more effort should be put in supporting abortion alternatives. In Eric Shansberg's excellent book Turn Neither To The Right Nor To The Left, he mentions that a lady who set up a table in front of an abortion clinic with balloons and a list of people who are looking to adopt. I loved that story. 

Friday, November 12, 2021

BOOK REVIEW: FAITH SEEKING FREEDOM BY DR. NORMAN HORN, DOUG STUART, KERRY BALDWIN, AND DICK CLARK

 

 

I remember a few years ago a debate on Julie Roys' Up For Debate program about whether Christianity and Libertarianism were compatible between Dr. Al Mohler, president of The Southern Theological Seminary and Dr. Norman Horn of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Any guesses which of the two took the pro-Libertarian side? Normally, I tend to agree with Mohler, but not on that subject.

Faith Seeking Freedom: Libertarian Christian Answers to Tough Questions, published by the Libertarian Christian Institute, is a well-researched and well-reasoned book showing the compatibility between a Libertarian political philosophy and the Christian faith.

This book is written by Dr. Norman Horn, Doug Stuart, Kerry Baldwin, and Dick Clark (though I doubt the author was the host for American Bandstand). The writing appears to be a team effort - there is no section where it designates which of the four wrote any section nor any first-person singular comments by one of the authors. (There are two places where one or two of the authors are mentioned by name, but it is worded in the third person.)

What does this book talk about? Or better yet, what does it NOT talk about? The authors answer questions on abortion (the longest chapter in this short book), patriotism, military service, capitalism, socialism, the war on drugs, prohibition, immigration, and misconceptions of libertarianism. There are areas where I disagree with the authors, but it gives something to think about.

Allow me to add some nit-picking. The first is the cover comment from the Honorable Andrew P. Napolitano, that this book is "Utterly faithful to Christian doctrine." My opinion? That quote is overkill. First, I think Judge Napolitano would be considered an expert on law and politics, but I would not put him in that category on theology. I would listen more if that quote was from someone like John MacArthur or Charles Stanley or Michael Youseff or Kay Arthur. Second, I would not consider this book to deal with doctrine or Orthodoxy, but rather Orthopraxy (right living). Most branches of theology, including Christology and Soterology and Ecclesiology, are absent from this book. However, to take the blurb to say this book is faithful to Christian living, I would have no argument.

The other gripe is there are times where the authors are solid on issues that I would give more leeway to. One is whether a Christian should be in the military. The authors make a good argument to seek other options of service, as well as that being a historical perspective, but is it an accident the Holy Spirit inspired Paul and others to use being a soldier as an example of Christian life? The other is immigration. I do believe that Christians should be in favor of legal immigration, but this book seems to advocate open borders. As I said, though, these are minor quibbles.

I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested in learning more about Libertarianism, and especially a Christian who isn't familiar with that philosophy. I'd also recommend it to a Libertarian minded individual who needs help dealing with questions that are asked. In other words, it is an aid for Libertarians to be able to give a defense for the hope that is withing them (1 Peter 3:15).