Showing posts with label Libertarian Christian Institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libertarian Christian Institute. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 4, 2023

PATRIOTISM: CHRISTIAN LOVE? THANKFULNESS TO GOD? IDOLATRY TO CAESAR? SOME OF EACH?

 

At Kingdom Come Festival, June 17, Howard County Vietnam Veterans Healing Fields, Greentown, IN

Is it appropriate for a Christian event to start with a pledge to the American flag?

This was the question raised by a commenter to a post on the Kingdom Come Festival's FB page, which I read a day or two before going to this year's Festival. 

The point was echoed from a blog shared by the Libertarian Christian Institute, "Should Christians Cite The Pledge of Allegiance?" by Laurence Vance. Vance points out how we lead the world in many dubious categories including incarcaration, illegal and legal drug use, and rapes. (At least in abortions we're in second place to Russia.) He concludes that this reality makes it a lie for Christians to say the pledge.

Of course, there are those who say that a Christian should be patriotic. Allow me to add wrinkles to that theory. Should a Christian in Nazi Germany or in Communist China or in Islamic Iran be patriotic to their countries as we are encouraged to be here? For those here, should we be equally supportive to both former President Trump and current President Biden? Could it be that we're inconsistent on what patriotism looks like based on our biases?

Statism is a real problem. I recommend these two books on the subject (I'm including links to my reviews on those books): Caesar and the Church: A Biblical Study of Government and Church by Anthony Forsyth and the Libertarian Christian Institute's Faith Seeking Freedom: Libertarian Answers to Tough Questions. I've seen church services where all the songs sung were patriotic, and special music consisting of a singing (or playing) of the themes for the different branches of the military, and heard a Memorial Day sermon which attempted to justify our American Holiday from Scripture. Could Statism be leavening our church services?

However, are these examples of statism? Is there a positive reason for Christians to say the pledge in a church service or have an American flag on the platform? 

I started this blog with a question about the Kingdom Come Festival's starting with a pledge. But how was that question answered? The person representing the festival, among other things, pointed out that it was being held at the Howard County Vietnam Veterans Grounds. In other words, the Festival organizers wanted to honor their hosts. Could our patriotism be out of love for those around us who love our country? Furthermore, may it reflect a heart of Thanksgiving for us being in a nation where we have freedom to call out our country when it sins? Some Patriotism may have a statist mindset, but not all; quite possibly, not most.

Also, it is true that every nation fits into one of two categories: 1) An enemy of the faith and the Gospel and 2) A potential enemy of the faith and the Gospel. Ours included. We may think the other side of the aisle is antagonistic to Christianity, but is our side of the aisle completely in line? Do we tolerate either racism or abortion? Are both oppression of the poor and the LGBTQ+ lifestyle correctly seen as condemned by God? We need to remember we're Christians first, and our allegiance is to Christ, not our nation; that our kinsmen are not the unbeliever in our nation but the believers in all nations.

Yet God commanded us to honor all men and to honor the King (1 Pet. 2:17). The Bible states that to resist the authority God appointed is to resist His ordinances and to bring judgment on us. When we are questioning whether a Christian should say the pledge in church or have a flag on the platform, is it because we rightly see Christ as our sovereign, or is it a rebellious heart that does not want to submit to others? One is good, the other no where close.

Let me close by reminding us we need to be loving to those around us. That love may be in saying the pledge with the rest of the congregation with a thankful heart, and it may be in listening to those who have problems with our nation.

Okay, one final paragraph. I'm grateful to be here, and show it by praying for those God appointed over me, regardless of party. And wishing you all a Happy Independence Day.



Tuesday, April 12, 2022

INTERVIEW WITH KERRY BALDWIN OF MERE LIBERTY, CO-AUTHOR OF FAITH SEEKING FREEDOM.


 

JR: First, welcome, Kerry. How did you come to Christ, and what influenced you to be, as your pod-cast promo on Facebook is described, "Theologically Reformed, and Philosophically Libertarian?"

KB: I was raised in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod (LCMS); baptized as an infant and confirmed in the faith when I was 15. I have an inquisitive nature and continued to ask questions to understand the deeper truth of doctrine, but met resistance in one form or another. I spent a few years attending Baptist and non-denominational churches in my 20s. In roughly 2006, I decided to really examine the doctrine of baptism so I could decide whether or not to baptize my own kids as infants. This examination took me to R.C. Sproul and Ligonier who seemed to be answering the questions I had been asking for many years. And the study of baptism conveniently (providentially) found me exploring related doctrines on soteriology, eschatology, covenant theology, and more. In 2014, I officially became Reformed by joining an Orthodox Presbyterian Church (OPC).

My exploration of reformed theology and libertarian philosophy began exclusively from one another, and only by happenstance. In 2008, I learned about Ron Paul and libertarian philosophy thanks to his ’08 presidential run. Much of what he was saying lined up with things I had been learning through Sproul and Ligonier and so found some compatibility. As time went on, I found there was so much compatibility that my research into the two fields really began to converge. I eventually found Reformational Philosophy, originated from the Dutch Reformed tradition of Abraham Kuyper and Herman Dooyeweerd. This non-reductive view of the world, grounded in Calvinism, became the glue that now holds my libertarian philosophy and reformed theology together.

JR: I'd like to hear about your ministry, Mere Liberty. Could you tell me about the Liberty Seminar and the coming link Reformed Eikon?

KB: Just a correction: I don’t consider Mere Liberty a ministry. A ministry is something directly connected to the institutional church and ecclesiastical office. Though I do write about matters relevant to theology, I adhere to the view that the office of ministry is reserved to qualified men in the institutional church.

So, my website is simply a place where I can publish and share my thoughts on philosophical matters from a Reformed perspective. My mission with Mere Liberty is to challenge prevailing paradigms in politics, religion, and culture. This may be challenging non-libertarian Christians to consider more seriously the principles of a free society. It may also be challenging non-reformed Christians to consider more seriously the importance of true doctrine. And it may also include challenging reformed Christians on whether their views are truly reformed.

The Liberty Seminar is an online, semester-long, course I developed in 2020 when the lockdowns happened. I am a single, work-from-home, mother of three – and I homeschool them. One of the ways I managed to do this was by teaching my kids how to think well. My philosophy background and inquisitive nature meant incorporating the Socratic method (inquiry-based learning) into my homeschool model. By teaching my kids how to think (not merely what to think), they have the tools necessary to teach themselves anything. As families across the nation were thrown into “remote schooling” I wanted to offer a resource to parents that teaches them and their kids these valuable skills. But to learn how to think, we need ideas to think about. The ideas I present for discussion are the principles of living in a free and prosperous society. I offer these courses for middle schoolers, high schoolers, and adults.

I have made no formal announcements about Reformed Eikon yet. I have been compiling Reformed resources which are non-egalitarian but challenge the (arguably) non-Reformed (Baptistic) views of Complementarianism viz the Council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW). This is a controversial topic. Many conservative Christians assume complementarianism is merely a general belief about the natural complementarity between men and women, and a proper view of qualified male-only ordination. This is not the case. I have found that though CBMW affirms these basic facts, they have developed and promote some highly questionable doctrine that, at the very least, is not Reformed. Reformed Eikon will provide a host of resources to demonstrate the case that we can hold to historic reformed orthodoxy, gender complementarity, and qualified male-only ordination while rejecting the numerous errors of complementarianism (and by extension, so-called “biblical patriarchy.”) Just to be clear, as this is easily misconstrued, I do not support the ordination of women, nor “lay teaching” during public worship, on the Lord’s Day. I am not the least bit interested in softening this view. Nor do I support feminism. For my position on feminism, you can listen to my episode, What is Feminism in Simple Terms? https://mereliberty.com/podcasts/what-is-feminism-in-simple-terms/ And my view of women’s ordination, here: https://mereliberty.com/podcasts/can-reformed-women-be-ordained-deacons/

JR: One of the best books I read last year is a book you're a co-author of, Faith Seeking Freedom: Libertarian Christian Answers to Tough Questions. What feedback have you received to this book? Anything you'd like to say about the Libertarian Christian Institute? Also, what was it like working with not one, but three other co-writers?

KB: Of those who’ve read the book and commented, I’ve heard nothing but excellent reviews. To be fair, the respondents have been mostly already convinced of libertarianism. But many newer libertarians get asked tough questions they sometimes don’t have an answer for. So, this book provides concise answers with resources for further study. I’d love to hear feedback on the book from a non-libertarian, however.

The Libertarian Christian Institute (LCI) was born out of the question, what is the best expression of Christian political thought? Conventionally the answer to this question has been, republicanism, in large part due to the conservative coalition in the 1980s. If one takes the time to study further though, political party lines used to be divided on very different issues, and many Christians were Democrats before Jerry Fallwell’s “moral majority” took root as Republicans. Christians today, including the Reformed, tend to take for granted political philosophy and the need for a robust public discourse. Many Reformed are unaware of the libertarian roots of notable Presbyterians such as J. Gresham Machen, who might have been the first Christian to be labeled a ‘libertarian.’ So LCI, reevaluates the question and (essentially) concludes that libertarianism is the best expression of Christian political thought. Obviously, that’s somewhat of a loaded answer and requires an explanation. That’s why our book, Faith Seeking Freedom is valuable to the uninitiated Christian. LCI is not itself Reformed – it’s ecumenical but limited to the Trinitarian Christian tradition that ascribes to the ancient creeds. I represent the Reformed voice on staff.

What was it like working with three other authors for the book? It went pretty smooth, actually. There’s 102 questions and we each took a quarter of the questions based on our knowledge set. Then we reviewed each other’s work to refine it. If anything, I’d say our ability to work cohesively, from different theological backgrounds, evidences our claim that libertarianism is indeed the best expression of Christian political thought.

JR: This world has always been a mess, but I think we're in an era where it's messier than normal. What would be a "Theologically Reformed, Philosophically Libertarian" solution? Are the problems more political, spiritual, or none of the above?

KB: I wouldn’t necessarily say that things are “messier than normal.” I’d say, we’re now more keenly aware of the messiness that has always been. The Internet has really allowed us to shine a light on pervasive and perennial problems. But if, for example, you’ve read Machen on politics, you’d see that much of this is not new. Here’s an article I wrote about that. https://libertarianchristians.com/2018/10/22/taking-up-machens-torch-an-archetype-for-christian-libertarians/

I do believe that the Reformed view offers a unique perspective as to the “solution” viz the Kuyperian concept of Sphere Sovereignty. I have heard some guys like Doug Wilson appeal to Kuyper, but I’d say Wilson’s understanding and application of sphere sovereignty is deeply flawed. If your readers would like a more thorough treatment of Reformed Libertarianism I commend them to read the statements that I and my colleague, Gregory Baus, formulated on the matter:

Gregory Baus and I have also begun discussions of the Reformed Anarchism statement on my podcast, Dare to Think, beginning with episode 26 on culture.

Other important points of interest from the Reformed perspective is the historically reformed position of resistance to tyrants. You can read more about our view of Romans 13 here: https://mereliberty.com/romans13/

Also, many Christians tend to resist libertarianism because the Libertarian Party comes off as very socially liberal on issues like abortion, drug use, prostitution, etc. I have offered a libertarian theory relevant to abortion that indicates libertarianism is foundationally prolife. In the book, Faith Seeking Freedom, I wrote the chapter on abortion (as well as most of the chapter on Christian ethics) to address these important matters. You can see all my work relevant to abortion, including my Soho Forum debate against PhD Economist, Walter Block, at https://mereliberty.com/abortion

JR: Thank you for your time. If someone wants to learn more about Mere Liberty, how can they accomplish this? And I didn't take time to ask about your alma mater? (Though I'll confess, I always found it easier to root for Wildcats than Sun Devils.)

KB: I must confess that I attended Arizona State University online – so never participated in the on campus culture. None the less, I graduated from ASU, summa cum laude, in 2015 with a BA in Philosophy.

Please feel free to visit mereliberty.com to learn more about me and my work. You can find information on my online courses there as well. You can find my podcast, Dare to Think, on any podcatcher. I appreciate reviews on iTunes, Spotify, Amazon, and YouTube. You can also find me on Facebook and Twitter. If you friend me on Facebook, please send a message introducing yourself. I screen friend requests and I’m more likely to accept yours if you’ve messaged me.


Friday, November 12, 2021

BOOK REVIEW: FAITH SEEKING FREEDOM BY DR. NORMAN HORN, DOUG STUART, KERRY BALDWIN, AND DICK CLARK

 

 

I remember a few years ago a debate on Julie Roys' Up For Debate program about whether Christianity and Libertarianism were compatible between Dr. Al Mohler, president of The Southern Theological Seminary and Dr. Norman Horn of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Any guesses which of the two took the pro-Libertarian side? Normally, I tend to agree with Mohler, but not on that subject.

Faith Seeking Freedom: Libertarian Christian Answers to Tough Questions, published by the Libertarian Christian Institute, is a well-researched and well-reasoned book showing the compatibility between a Libertarian political philosophy and the Christian faith.

This book is written by Dr. Norman Horn, Doug Stuart, Kerry Baldwin, and Dick Clark (though I doubt the author was the host for American Bandstand). The writing appears to be a team effort - there is no section where it designates which of the four wrote any section nor any first-person singular comments by one of the authors. (There are two places where one or two of the authors are mentioned by name, but it is worded in the third person.)

What does this book talk about? Or better yet, what does it NOT talk about? The authors answer questions on abortion (the longest chapter in this short book), patriotism, military service, capitalism, socialism, the war on drugs, prohibition, immigration, and misconceptions of libertarianism. There are areas where I disagree with the authors, but it gives something to think about.

Allow me to add some nit-picking. The first is the cover comment from the Honorable Andrew P. Napolitano, that this book is "Utterly faithful to Christian doctrine." My opinion? That quote is overkill. First, I think Judge Napolitano would be considered an expert on law and politics, but I would not put him in that category on theology. I would listen more if that quote was from someone like John MacArthur or Charles Stanley or Michael Youseff or Kay Arthur. Second, I would not consider this book to deal with doctrine or Orthodoxy, but rather Orthopraxy (right living). Most branches of theology, including Christology and Soterology and Ecclesiology, are absent from this book. However, to take the blurb to say this book is faithful to Christian living, I would have no argument.

The other gripe is there are times where the authors are solid on issues that I would give more leeway to. One is whether a Christian should be in the military. The authors make a good argument to seek other options of service, as well as that being a historical perspective, but is it an accident the Holy Spirit inspired Paul and others to use being a soldier as an example of Christian life? The other is immigration. I do believe that Christians should be in favor of legal immigration, but this book seems to advocate open borders. As I said, though, these are minor quibbles.

I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested in learning more about Libertarianism, and especially a Christian who isn't familiar with that philosophy. I'd also recommend it to a Libertarian minded individual who needs help dealing with questions that are asked. In other words, it is an aid for Libertarians to be able to give a defense for the hope that is withing them (1 Peter 3:15).