BOOK REVIEW - "WHAT DOES THE BIBLE REALLY TEACH ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY?" BY KEVIN DEYOUNG

 This book, "What Does the Bible Really Teach about Homosexuality?" is on a subject where the majority of people have a strong opinion and a good number of which are unwilling to show tolerance for the other side. One question, though, is whether one believes the Bible is an authoritative, inerrant, infallible, and accurate source we're to consider the Word of God written so we can understand it or if fallible men (we all fall into that category) know what's best with a changing of minds from the traditional to the anti-traditional.

Author Kevin DeYoung points right off in the introduction states the book is a Christian book with a narrow focus to defend a traditional view of marriage. Thus, we should expect him to present that view as the best alternative.  

Part one of this book focuses on Scripture, with chapters 1-5 dealing with, respectively, Genesis 1-2, Genesis 19, Leviticus 18 and 20, Romans 1, and 1 Corinthians 6/1 Timothy 1, all of which deal with God's design for marriage and teachings on Homosexuality. The second part deals with answers to seven pro-LGBTQ+ arguments (one per chapter).

There are three appendices after Chapter 12. The first two address the issues of gay marriage and same-sex attraction. The third appendix is titled "The Church and Homosexuality: Ten Commitments." DeYoung points out the different groups of people we're dealing with - in other words, we wouldn't treat a person who's asking questions and possibly struggling with the issue, a sufferer who has been mistreated by the church, and an activist who has less tolerance for traditional Christians than they think the Christians have.

Allow me to offer some insights both from before reading this book and looking at negative reviews. One is that those who consider that the Bible is authoritative and opposes homosexuality is based on what the Bible says. Okay, maybe not much but what it says is consistent. On the other hand, I've seen inconsistency with the arguments of those who affirm that lifestyle - some say that the Bible doesn't mean what we think it means while others say it does mean what it says, but it is a reflection of the views of that time and not God's view. 

Also, I see the cliche that those oppose LGBTQ+ are hateful in the criticisms of this book. However, if we believe that lifestyle is leading a person to judgment, which is more loving? Allowing them to leap off lemming cliff and face condemnation? Or to warn them and plead with them to avoid the destruction they're headed to? If you read the whole book, you'll see it is focusing on the actions being wrong, but God desiring the person would turn and avoid destruction.

BOOK REVIEW - "SHATTERED SANCTUARY" (THE ERIN DELANEY MYSTERIES BOOK ONE) BY NANCY MEHL

 

Mystery Writer and former police-officer Erin Delaney's only friend is an ex-FBI Behavioral Analsyst she has never met in person; will that friendship endure spending some time together in an isolated cabin? Oh, did I mention that there is a ghost walking around? No? How about the body the local police discovered?

"Shattered Sanctuary" is the first book in Nancy Mehl's new "The Erin Delaney Mysteries," and it is what you expect. A well woven mystery. Creepy villains. A nail abiting Psychological Thriller. And it delivers.

Longtime Mehl readers like myself (this is my 21st novel of hers I've read) will be happy to see Kaely Quinn-Hunter return early in the story; Quinn was the main character in a previous series and guested in another novel ("Dead Fall"). My interest piqued with the title "Shattered Sanctuary" because Mehl also had a trilogy called "Finding Sanctuary," and I wondered if there was a return to that small Midwest town. It didn't take me long to realize this was another small town called "Sanctuary," this time in the Smokies.

Yes, this is the first in a series, and usually there is no need to worry about if you're spoiling a story by reading it out of order, but would the return of Kaely change that? In my opinion, not at all. Yes, reading the "Kaely Quinn Profiler" series would help you get to know her, and the same is true with "Dead Fall," but it won't have an effect with enjoying this new tale.

As usual, I highly recommend this novel by Nancy Mehl. By the way, I also recommend the"Kaely Quinn Profiler" trilogy and for that matter, the Quantico Files trilogy, of which "Dead Fall" is the middle story. And I'll add the "Finding Sactuary" series to the list, though it's in a different genre.

AN EVENING HANGING OUT WITH PETER IN NEVERLAND - MOVIE REVIEWS OF DISNEY'S "PETER PAN" AND SPIELBERG'S "HOOK"

 You may have remembered that last year I spend a few hours, watching both Disney's '51 animated and '10 live action films titled "Alice In Wonderland." Well, this year I decided to watch Disney's "Peter Pan" ('53) and "Hook" ('91).

There is a noticeable difference between my Alice binge last year and the Peter Pan double feature: As I mentioned, both Alices were Disney pictures. "Hook" isn't a Disney movie. In fact, one thing that I noticed was there was an allusion to Tinkerbell drinking poison to save Peter's life, as in the original story and plays, as opposed to her rescuing Peter from a bomb in the Disney version.

When I was young, I loved Peter Pan. It was onc of the Disney albums telling the story with a short illustrated version that I had - probably my second favorite (Jungle Book taking first place). However, it wasn't until seeing this movie again that I realized  that Peter was a womanizing flirt, mad when jealous Tinkerbell tried to have Wendy killed, laughing when jealous bikini-clad mermaids tried to drown Wendy, and having Tiger Lilly dance for him.

While I didn't catch this when I was 10, I did pick up on the racial slurs towards Indians (would characters in an English story that takes place in a fantasy world accurately be called Native Americans?). Even as a kid, I cringed wht the "What Made The Red Man Red." This was the first exposure I had to racial prejudice.

I am surprised at my typing this review, but "Hook" is more of a family film than the Disney classic. I will say it had a slower start before the film picked up. But Robin Williams, Dustin Hoffman, Julia Roberts, and Bob Hoskins (playing Peter, Captain Hook, Tinkerbell, and Mr. Smee respectively) did a great job in making this entertaining. 

Before I forget, I'll mention that my first introduction to Peter Pan was on the Disneyland dark ride (as was the case with Alice in Wonderland). This was the original version, where Peter was no where on the ride except for his shadow (the idea is for the rider to view themselves as Peter; same was true with the Alice, Mr. Toad, and Snow White rides).

THANKSGIVING THOUGHTS.

 

Cartoon from James Lawson. Used by permission.

This week, I saw a couple of posts and and heard a podcast dealing with Thanksgiving. 

Let me start with this cartoon by James Lawson that has blessed me for years. I do, however, have an answer or two about why pilgrims are loved and Puritans are hated. It has nothing to do about doctrine, but rather who is the oppressor and who is oppressed. The Pilgrims are seen as victims to the bad Church of English who were persecuting them. The Puritans (at least some of them), on the other hand, were the oppressors. The existence of Rhode Island is proof of that, where Roger Williams and other Baptists fled to.

Switching gears but not leaving the cartoon yet... To be honest, I don't think the Pilgrims are as beloved as they used to be. Is doctrine involved here? Good question, but if it is, it's not that the hatred toward the Pilgrims/Puritans' Reformed Doctrine but the doctrine that is shared by all believers.

This is related to an article that was on the Indianapolis Public Library's website. There question is what indigenous peoples think, giving the answer that they see Thanksgiving as a day of mourning. They gave a link to see for the indigenous people's view of colonization. First, let me state that I don't think that the original residents of this country were treted right by some of our ancestors. Howver, should we have what has been a day of celebration of faith and family and for the unenlightened, football (the enlightened, like me, have the TV tuned to America's Dog Show) and feel guilty for something that we personally didn't do and something that we can't undo even if we wanted to (which I do).

Let me share a couple of thoughts I've heard before, but Al Mohler (President of The Southern Baptist Seminary in Louisville) reminded me. First, Thanksgiving is uniquely American holiday. Second, even the non-Christians are thankful, but to whom? Doesn't this show that we're not as secular as the world wants us to be?

Again, happy Thanksgiving. Hope your day is blessed.

JOIN ME ON A RIDE ON THE DARK RIDE SIDE

Fantasyland sign for the Alice in Wonderland Ride. Interesting fact - this ride is only at Disneyland.

 

It was rather recently that I heard the term "dark ride." My mind at first connected dark as, well, dark, as in dark comedy, dark music, etc. No, it didn't take me long to realize they meant rides that went into dark indoor adventures. 

I spent the first 9 1/3 years of my life in Fullerton, California. This meant every other holiday I went to Disneyland and the other found us (Mom and Dad and I) at Knott's Berry Farm. The high-light for me was the Calico Mine Train Ride at Knott's and a quartet of Fantasyland dark rides at Disneyland. This repritoire expanded in Disneyland with the "20,000 Leagues  Under the Sea" walk-through, "Adventure Through Inner Space" (which replaced the previously mentioned Walk Through, "It's A Small World," "Pirates of the Carribean," and parts of the Submarine Ride, 'Mine Train Through Nature's Wonderland" (replaced by Thunder Mountain Railroad) and the train that circles Disneyland which ends with "The Grand Canyon and Primeval World." Yes, all of those were Dark Rides I grew up with. (Yes, "Space Mountain" and "The Haunted Mansion" came shortly afterward, but that was after I moved from California and didn't attend there as often.) 

While I enjoyed all the rides mentioned above - plus some outdoor rides like the Antique Cars (aka Tijuana Taxi) at Knott's or Disneyland's Jungle Cruise) - my favorite part was getting to Peter Pan, Snow White, Alice in Wonderland, and Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, and this is where I'll focus. 

Knott's Berry Farm's Calico Mine Train Ride.

Before I do that, however, I need to give a shoutout to Calico Mine Train. As far as I know, there is no movie that this is based on, but just a creative ride that tells its own story. And while it has a last minute thrill when there's a danger of an explosion, the train gets out of the mine and out to the bright sunny (or starry at night) sky. One other note - both this and the above mentioned "Mine Train Through Nature's Wonderland" have caverns, but while Knott's looks artificial, it is more realistic than the Disney version.

Back to the Disney rides. In the original version, the only time you see any of the titular characters is the large cast painting on Peter Pan, Snow White, and Mr. Toad. The philosophy of these rides is that the rider is seeing through the charcater's eyes. Of course, in the first decade of my life, I was acquainted with the concepts of philosophy and understood exactly what they were doing. You believe that? Me neither. By the way, another fact is the rides weren't retellings of the movie but were in essense their own story. 

Jeremy Thompson - https://www.flickr.com/photos/rollercoasterphilosophy/51240734807/

Of course, every story has a happy ever ending, right? Well, not these rides. Snow White' conclusion was the witch trying to roll a boulder on you. Peter Pan had the crocodile snapping at you. Alice in Wonderland had you exiting the Mad Hatter's Tea Party to a flash and going through four consecutive doors before you went down a long vine - a little better than the previous two. But the kicker is Mr. Toad, where you end up in hell with a batch of noisy demons.

Each of the rides have creative vehicles. Snow White has mine cars with the Dwarves' names on them. Peter Pan has a track above the car, to give the illusion of flying over London and Neverland. Mr. Toad has antique coupes, while you get to visit Wonderland inside Caterpilar cars. 

Peter Pan's Flight. To the left is Mr. Toad.

While each had its scary moments (driving with a terrible driver like Mr. Toad or having Mr. Smee shoot at you before the Crocodile pops up), "Snow White and Her Adventures" had the reputation of being the scariest. They put a note in the ride descriptions warning parents, and by the '80's it was called "Snow White's Scary Adventures." I don't know why a pair of vultures and the witch offering you an apple would be called scary. However, I've learned from a Yesterworld You Tube video that mentioned the Disneyland version was nothing compared to its equivalent in Disneyworld's Magic Kingdom. 

Is it saying something that the rides featuring a female lead were the scarier ones? "Alice in Wonderland"s original design gave it a run for its money, with a creepy Chesire cat and a giant Mad Hatter calling you rude. By the time I got to remember the ride, it was toned down some. It did become my favorite, even though I didn't see the movie until the late '80's (and that was the hour long edited version). Come to think of it, after rewatching the original version, that might be why I liked it. While you saw the White Rabbit (blowing a horn at you), the Chesire Cat, the flowers (including an angry Dandy Lion), the birds, the Mad Hatter, the March Hare, and the Dormouse, there was no Caterpillar (you were riding him), Tweedledum and Tweedledee, or Queen (and King) of Hearts. And this ride, part of the same building as Mr. Toad and Peter Pan, didn't have the portrait with all the characters like the other rides. By the way, Disneyland is the only Disney park with this ride.

Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, By SolarSurfer - Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5635296

So you can say that these dark rides lived up to the dark. None had a real resolution. You were off kilter with loud noises that may or may not have belonged (such as Goofy's voice as you're going through a collection of doors shrinking in size on Alice). I've grown up, but I do remember feeling "is this all there is?" Now, not all dark rides have that darkness (nothing dark about "It's A Small World").

In the early to mid '80's, Fantasyland had a major makeover. It ended with a fifth ride added to the Dark Ride collection ("Pinocchio's Daring Journey"), and a complete renovation of the original four rides. With the exception of Mr. Toad, the title characters showed up on the ride. (Pinocchio and Alice with the White Rabbit also are singing along on Disneyland's "It's A Small World.") Alice's ride now has the missing characters. Likewise, the rides are a little closer to the original stories (except Mr. Toad).

The beginning and ending of the Alice In Wonderland ride, with the now defunct sky buckets. If you look carefully, the track goes into neither of the openings in the back. They've taken out part of it's next door neighbor Mr. Toad to end the ride with a Tea Party and a band from the White Rabbit.

How about the endings? Pinocchio has a happy ending. Snow White now ends with her revived with her prince. Peter Pan has Peter piloting the pirate ship back home, while Captain Hook is trying to avoid being swallowed by the Crocodile, and Smee is rowing to the rescue. Alice's ride took some of Mr. Toad's real estate to have an extra couple of scenes which include her at a tea party with the Mad Hatter and the March Hare, as well as the White Rabbit lighting what's either an unbirthday candle or a bomb. 

And Mr. Toad? Uh, some things stay the same, and some get worse. In other word, you still have the fire and brimstone ending, except it's a little longer. 

READING MILESTONE - I HAVE BROKEN THE CENTURY MARK READING LOVE INSPIRED SUSPENSE NOVELS!

Regular blog readers know I regularly post reviews of Love Inspired Suspense books. Many of those know that it is an imprint of Harlequin Romance, yet nobody has asked me to turn in my man's card. Yet.

How did I get started? Well, I had gotten into reading Christian fiction, and during that time between 2010 and 2018 there were authors I wanted to read: Virginia Smith, Camy Tang, and Rachel Dylan. In each case, the book I located was a Love Inspired Suspense title ("Scent of Murder," "Gone Missing," and "Picture Perfect Murder" respectively. I enjoyed all the stories, but these happened to be more of a focus on particular authors.

Let me back up a little and go to the time I was a member of the ACFW (American Christian Fiction Writers) and took a class on point of view taught by Virgina Smith. In it, she mentioned "Scent of Murder" had four point of view characters, and she told how she justified having that many. That was the first Love Inspired Suspense book I read, and also the last one that had more than two point of view characters (the main protagonists).

Then, in 2019, Becky picked up "Undercover Protector" by Elizabeth 
Goddard. The story took place at a Tiger sanctuary. For a person who as a kid rooted for the Detroit Tigers, Detroit Lions, Cincinnati Bengals, and Arizona Wildcats, I read it and loved it. A month or so later, Becky  brought home "Dead Run" by Jodie Bailey. By the end of that year, I had read nine Love Inspired Suspense stories (including three by Jodie Bailey) and was ready for more. Allow me to add that Bailey would have a novella and two novels set at the Grand Canyon, enough to make me homesick. One more thing - one of those first Love Inspired novels I read was written by Meghan Carver, who was a fellow member of the Indiana chapter of ACFW when I belonged to the group.

Besides Bailey, I also discovered Jessica Patch. All the authors were great at giving you characters you cared about as well as exciting, twist filled stories, but there are several characters (main and secondary) that stood out and catch my interest. For example, Wilder Flynn from "Dangerous Obsession" (the first Patch story I read) made an impression by liking to tell stories and being obseessed with his hair. He made it to my 20 favorite fictional characters back in 2020. At this point, I've read 19 books by Bailey and 15 by Patch.

Right before COVID hit in 2020, I caught on that they had an annual 9 part multi-author K-9 Unit series each year. The story lasted from April to November, with a new book coming out each month, and in December they had a two novella release. From January to March, they would release new entries to their Search and Rescue series, though unlike the K-9 series during the year, this was basically a collection of stand-alone novels taking place in the wilderness. I've now read 60 of these K-9 books. Yes, I'm a dog lover, though I know that the dog is basically a supporting character (I've seen Amazon reviews where the reader wanted more of the dogs). One other note - I discovered another of my favorite authors - Terri Reed - from these K-9 series. Jodie Bailey joined the rotation in '21, and Jessica Patch followed suit two years later.

I'll admit that this series is very formulaic. I mentioned that aside from Virginia Smith's "Scent of Murder," all of the stories are told from the point of view only of the male lead and the female lead. The action usually starts by the end of the first chapter. In the midst of running for their lives and solving crimes, somewhere in the middle the main characters kiss and immediately determine that should never happen again (of course, by the end of the story they changed their minds and fell in love). 

These definitely consider these Christian novels. The characters pray. Sometimes, one of the leads has no interest in God; other times, they're convinced God has no interest in them. It's never preachy - it focuses more on those who are having their faith tested than those who are unbelievers.

In case you haven't noticed from the top, there are six new Love Inspired Suspense books each month. I used to suggest most of them for purchase from the library the first couple of years. I'll confess that they are a bit repitive, so I'll typically suggest one or two books a month (including the multi-author K-9 series), and rarely getting up to three. 

Will I ever burn out on these? Who knows. But it is nice light, positive suspense.

 

REVISED BOOK REVIEW - "LIFE OF JESUS IN 30 DAYS" BY TREVIN WAX

Yes, I have already reviewed this book. So why am I reviewing it again?

Earlier this year, I got this book from the library. However, I had to return it before I finished it, so I went ahead and wrote a review. I thought by that point I had enough of the flavor of this book to review it. After all, it was a collection of readings

Here is what I had previously written from my review, posted April 1, 2025 (no April Fool's Day jokes here). 

"Definitely the best liturgical book written by a Southern Baptist I've read.

"'Life of Jesus in 30 Days' is a devotional book compiled by Trevin Wax, Vice President of Research and Resource Development of the Southern Baptist Convention's North American Mission Board. He also has followed a similar format with book on Psalms and the Letters of Paul.

"Each day is divided into three readings: morning, midday, and evening. The middle section is shorter, and Wax says it could be combined with the evening reading if your schedule does not allow the middle reading, though the midday is the shortest of the three. Each reading is highlighted by a passage from the Gospels (not in order nor exhaustive), but also has other thoughts from Scripture, creeds (the Apostle's Creed is there at least three times), and readings from the Common Prayer Book. Each of the 90 readings also includes the Gloria Patra and the Lord's Prayer.

"This is a little more liturgical/high church than I'm used to. But this book and the other two I mentioned are good at helping you have a developed devotional time. I do recommend this collection."

So again, why am I revising the review? I noticed something that won't (for most people) affect your views on the book. However, since most of the book is reading through Scripture, I noticed an inconsistency that I wanted to point out. Not enough to invalidate the book, but something I caught.

This concerns questionable sections. I'll give you credit for knowing that there are 5,000+ Greek manuscripts, with a whole lot of variations between those texts, with some putting the weight on the most common reading and most favoring those in the earliest texts. There are three examples in the Gospels: those early texts do not contain the benediction of the Lord's Prayer in Matthew 6 ("For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever), the story of the woman caught in adultery in John 8:1-11, and the long ending of Mark 16.

I have noticed inconsistencies in the readings. Wax includes John 8:3-11, but does not include Mark. Why include one and not the other? Also, 29 of the 30 readings include the Lord's Prayer, complete with the benediction. The 30th reading is where it covers Matthew 6:1-18, which includes the Lord's Prayer, but here it leaves the benediction off. This is author's prerogitive, and it's not a legitimate reason to not use this book or the others in the series. I just found it interesting.